Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1938] HCA 7,1938-0225 HCA B
Year1938
Date1938
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
130 cases
2 books & journal articles
  • The Constitution’s Guarantee of Legal Accountability for Jurisdictions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 49-4, December 2021
    • 1 December 2021
    ...rights or obligations on the fact of a purported exercise of jurisdiction by a Ch II body.75 Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369, 389 (Dixon J). See esp Kable 2 (n 48) 135 [38] - [39](French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell and Keane JJ), 140 [56] (Gageler J).76 Arguab......
  • Why These Three? the Significance of the Selection of Remedies in Section 75(V) of the Australian Constitution
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...that there is, as yet, no clear and coherent explanation for the selection of remedies in s 75(v). Parisienne Basket Shoes v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369, 392 (Dixon J). See generally William Wade, ‘Unlawful Administrative Action: Void or Voidable? (Part I)’ (1967) 83 Law Quarterly Review 499, 5......