Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1938] HCA 7,1938-0225 HCA B |
| Date | 1938 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
124 cases
- Mak Sik Kwong v Minister of Home Affairs, Malaysia
-
Fish v Solution 6 Holdings Ltd
...CLR 146 at 152 [3]. 142 See above these reasons at [115]. 143Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 69. 145 IR Act, s 153(1)(c). 146Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369 at 374, 389; R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union,......
-
Probuild Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Shade Systems Pty Ltd
...for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597; [2002] HCA 11. 88Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369 at 391–392; [1938] HCA 89Platz v Osborne (1943) 68 CLR 133 at 148; [1943] HCA 39. See also Overseers of the Poor of Walsall v London and North ......
-
Berowra Holdings Pty Ltd v Gordon
...of the courts ‘save to the extent that the legislation in question expressly so states or necessarily implies’. Earlier, in Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte, Dixon J said 26: ‘[I]f the legislature does make the jurisdiction of a court contingent upon the actual existence of a state o......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The Constitution’s Guarantee of Legal Accountability for Jurisdictions
...rights or obligations on the fact of a purported exercise of jurisdiction by a Ch II body.75 Parisienne Basket Shoes Pty Ltd v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369, 389 (Dixon J). See esp Kable 2 (n 48) 135 [38] - [39](French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell and Keane JJ), 140 [56] (Gageler J).76 Arguab......
-
Why These Three? the Significance of the Selection of Remedies in Section 75(V) of the Australian Constitution
...that there is, as yet, no clear and coherent explanation for the selection of remedies in s 75(v). Parisienne Basket Shoes v Whyte (1938) 59 CLR 369, 392 (Dixon J). See generally William Wade, ‘Unlawful Administrative Action: Void or Voidable? (Part I)’ (1967) 83 Law Quarterly Review 499, 5......