Parker v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1997] HCA 15,1997-0411 HCA A |
| Year | 1997 |
| Date | 1997 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
R v Tang
...HCA 19(Barlow). The passage cites Vallance v. RUNK(1961) 108 CLR 56 at 75–6; [1963] ALR 461 at 474–5; [1961] HCA 42 and Parker v. RUNK(1997) 186 CLR 494 at 517–19; 143 ALR 293 at 309–10; [1997] HCA 114 Reasons of Gleeson CJ at para. 49. 115 Referring to He Kaw TehUNK at CLR 568; ALR 481. 11......
-
R v Taufahema
...v The Queen is of a quite different kind from the two ‘cases’ in the present application for special leave to appeal. 66 Finally, in Parker v The Queen59 Dawson, Toohey and McHugh JJ refused to order a new trial to enable the prosecution to present a fresh case which would require ‘a substa......
-
David Harold Eastman v DPP
...the alleged offence and the new trial, and in particular whether the delay will occasion prejudice to the accused ( Taufahema at [55]; Parker v The Queen [1997] HCA 15; (1997) 186 CLR 494 at 520 (Dawson, Toohey and McHugh JJ); Anderson at 453); • whether the grant of a new trial would impe......
-
The Queen v Tang
...188 CLR 1 at 32; [1997] HCA 19. The passage cites Vallance v The Queen (1961) 108 CLR 56 at 75–76; [1961] HCA 42 and Parker v The Queen (1997) 186 CLR 494 at 517–519; [1997] HCA 114 Reasons of Gleeson CJ at [49]. 115 Referring to He Kaw Teh (1985) 157 CLR 523 at 568. 116 This is a special e......
Request a trial to view additional results