Putland v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Gummow,Heydon JJ.,Kirby J.,Callinan J.
Judgment Date12 February 2004
Neutral Citation2004-0212 HCA B,[2004] HCA 8
Docket NumberD11/2003
CourtHigh Court
Date12 February 2004
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
35 cases
  • Attorney-General (Cth) v Huynh
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • May 10, 2023
    ...Australia (2017) 262 CLR 1 at 25 [60]. 42 R v Loewenthal; Ex parte Blacklock (1974) 131 CLR 338 at 345. See also Putland v The Queen (2004) 218 CLR 174 at 179-180 [7], 188 [36], 189 [41], 215 43 R v Murphy (1985) 158 CLR 596 at 617. 44 (2017) 262 CLR 1 at 18 [32], 36-37 [90]-[92], 41 [103].......
  • Ruhani v Director of Police
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • August 31, 2005
    ...Centre; Ex parte Eastman (1999) 200 CLR 322 at 337 [27]. 86 (1983) 151 CLR 575. 87 (1999) 198 CLR 511. 89 See Putland v The Queen (2004) 78 ALJR 440 at 447 [33]; 204 ALR 455 at 464; Zines, Federal Jurisdiction in Australia, 3rd ed (2002) at 90Ruhani v Director of Police [No 2] [2005] HCA 43......
  • Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Nystrom
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • November 8, 2006
    ... ... 32 See Butler v Attorney-General (Vict) (1961) 106 CLR 268 at 275; Saraswati v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 1 at 17–18; Shergold v Tanner (2002) 209 CLR 126 at 136–137 [34]–[35]; Dossett v TKJ Nominees Pty Ltd (2003) 218 CLR 1 at 7 [14], 13–14 [43]; Putland v The Queen (2004) 218 CLR 174 at 189 [40] ... 33 cf Cobiac v Liddy (1969) 119 CLR 257 at 268 ... 34 (1948) 77 CLR 1 ... 35 (1948) 77 CLR 1 at 30. See also at 16–17 per Latham CJ, 35–36 per Williams ... ...
  • Baker v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • October 1, 2004
    ...mercy if they thought it deserved’:Devlin, Easing the Passing:The Trial of Dr John Bodkin Adams, (1985) at 125. 42Putland v The Queen (2004) 78 ALJR 440 at 447 [32]; 204 ALR 455 at 464. 43 (1954) 90 CLR 353 at 369. 44 (1998) 193 CLR 173 at 191–193 [27]–[29], 203 [57], 211–212 [83]–[84], 238......
  • Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
  • Due Process, Judicial Power and Chapter III in the New High Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-2, June 2004
    • June 1, 2004
    ...21 (Unreported, McHugh, Hayne and Kirby JJ, 2 April 2004) [28] (Kirby J). Cf, however, Cameron (2002) 209 CLR 339, 369 (Kirby J). 169 (2004) 204 ALR 455. 170 Ibid 462 (Gleeson CJ), 470–1 (Gummow and Heydon JJ), 486 (Callinan J). Cf at 483–5 (Kirby J) (dissenting). The case arose from the tr......
  • Involuntary Detention and the Separation of Judicial Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 35-1, March 2007
    • March 1, 2007
    ...Aid Service Inc v Bradley (2004) 218 CLR 146, 163 [28] (McHugh, Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Callinan and Heydon JJ); Putland v The Queen (2004) 218 CLR 174, 178 [4] (Gleeson CJ), 187–8 [33] (Gummow and Heydon JJ, Callinan J agreeing), 199 [73] (Kirby J). 291 Kable (1996) 189 CLR 53, 103 (Gaudron ......
  • Choice of Law and the Australian Constitution: Locating the Debate
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-1, March 2005
    • March 1, 2005
    ...133 (1996) 189 CLR 51 ('Kable'), 103. 134 Ibid 114. 135 (1992) 174 CLR 455. 136 (2004) 204 ALR 455 ('Putland'). 137 Ibid 470 [59]. 138 Ibid 471 [61]. 139 It seems, then, that in some contexts the constitutional constraints may affect the exercise of judicial power in a different way to the ......
  • Why Does the Common Law Conform to the Constitution?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 49-4, December 2021
    • December 1, 2021
    ...Legal Aid Service Inc v Bradley (2004) 218 CLR 146, 163 [28](McHugh, Gummow,Kirby, Hayne, Callinan and Heydon JJ); Putland v The Queen (2004) 218 CLR 174, 179 [178–9](Gleeson CJ), 187–8 [33] (Gummow and Hayne JJ), 199 [73] (Kirby J); North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency Ltdv Northern ......
  • Get Started for Free