R v Allen, Stuart William
| Jurisdiction | Tasmania |
| Judge | Cox CJ,Wright J,Slicer J |
| Judgment Date | 28 October 1999 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Tasmania |
| Docket Number | CCA 37/1999 |
| Date | 28 October 1999 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Wahl, Jade Victoriarnah v Tasmania (State of) [TASCCA]
...crimes, the hierarchy of the crimes in terms of seriousness turns on the mental element involved in each. See for example R v Allen [1999] TASSC 112, Cox CJ, [3]. As to the hierarchy of the considerable number of driving offences involving death or grievous bodily harm in New South Wales, s......
-
Dennison, Dennis John v State of Tasmania (the)
...(1984) 154 CLR 606). Reference to decisions of appellate courts in this jurisdiction (Papazoglu v R [1963] Tas SR 182 (NC 3); R v Allen [1999] TASSC 112; Hyde v R [2001] TASSC 50; Inkson v R (1996) 6 Tas R 1; DPP v Humphrey [2004] TASSC 99), the statistical tables published by Professor War......
-
DPP v Blyth, Stephen John [TASCCA]
...grievous bodily harm is generally regarded as worse than one against s172, which does not necessarily involve such an intent:R v Allen [1999] TASSC 112 per Cox CJ at par[2]; Barron v Tasmania [2010] TASCCA 3 at par[21]. 9 Some statistics as to sentences under s170 have been published by Pro......
-
Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania v McDonald, Kristian Clarence
...person’. A crime against s170 is generally regarded as worse than one against s172: Lovegrove v R [1961] Tas SR 106 at 107; R v Allen [1999] TASSC 112; Mansell v R [2001] TASSC 73 at par7. The respondent was sentenced without any suggestion that, at the time of the wounding, his acts were a......
Request a trial to view additional results