R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Company Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1953-0430 HCA A
Date1953
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
138 cases
  • Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Palme
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 2 October 2003
    ...Direction] and [the prosecutor's] comments, and have decided …’. 39 It was decided by this Court inR v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd16, where an order for prohibition under s 75(v) of the Constitution was made, that the ‘inadequacy’ of the ......
  • Re Singh Kalpanath
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 17 March 1992
    ...Lannon [1969] 1 QB 577 (refd) O'Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237; [1982] 3 All ER 1124 (refd) R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board (1953) 88 CLR 100 (distd) R v BaathThe Times (11 April 1990) (refd) R v Barnsley Licensing Justices, Ex parte Barnsley and District Licensed Victuallers' A......
  • Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Szlsp
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Mcgowan v Migration Agents Registration Authority
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Re-Evaluating the Doctrine of Deference in Administrative Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 45-4, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...unlawfulness. Care in this respect 159 See R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 100 (‘Melbourne Stevedoring’). 160 See, eg, Melbourne Stevedoring (1953) 88 CLR 100, 119 (Dixon CJ, Williams, Webb and Fullagar JJ). 161 Wednesbury [......
  • Disqualification of Judges and Pre-Judicial Advice
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 43-2, June 2015
    • 1 June 2015
    ...Group (1969) 122 CLR 546, 553–554. See also R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 100, 116 (Dixon CJ, Williams, Webb and Fullagar JJ); R v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248, 261–2 (Barwick CJ, Gibbs, Stephen and Mason ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT