R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Company Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1953-0430 HCA A |
| Date | 1953 |
| Year | 1953 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
140 cases
-
Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; ex parte Palme
...Direction] and [the prosecutor's] comments, and have decided …’. 39 It was decided by this Court inR v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd16, where an order for prohibition under s 75(v) of the Constitution was made, that the ‘inadequacy’ of the ......
-
Re Singh Kalpanath
...Lannon [1969] 1 QB 577 (refd) O'Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237; [1982] 3 All ER 1124 (refd) R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board (1953) 88 CLR 100 (distd) R v BaathThe Times (11 April 1990) (refd) R v Barnsley Licensing Justices, Ex parte Barnsley and District Licensed Victuallers' A......
- Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Szlsp
- Mcgowan v Migration Agents Registration Authority
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Re-Evaluating the Doctrine of Deference in Administrative Law
...unlawfulness. Care in this respect 159 See R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 100 (‘Melbourne Stevedoring’). 160 See, eg, Melbourne Stevedoring (1953) 88 CLR 100, 119 (Dixon CJ, Williams, Webb and Fullagar JJ). 161 Wednesbury [......
-
Disqualification of Judges and Pre-Judicial Advice
...Group (1969) 122 CLR 546, 553–554. See also R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 100, 116 (Dixon CJ, Williams, Webb and Fullagar JJ); R v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong (1976) 136 CLR 248, 261–2 (Barwick CJ, Gibbs, Stephen and Mason ......
-
The Burden of Proof in Taxation Disputes: Does Section 170 or Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Offend the Rule of Law?
...28 NSWLR 26, 32 (Gleeson CJ and Handley JA).45. R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board;Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 100, 117–18(Dixon CJ, Williams, Webb and Fullager JJ).46. Rees (n 42) 56. See also: Mahon v Air New Zealand [1984] AC 808, 820.47. Pochi (n43)67–......
-
The Burden of Proof in Taxation Disputes: Does Section 170 or Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Offend the Rule of Law?
...28 NSWLR 26, 32 (Gleeson CJ and Handley JA).45. R v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board;Ex parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 100, 117–18(Dixon CJ, Williams, Webb and Fullager JJ).46. Rees (n 42) 56. See also: Mahon v Air New Zealand [1984] AC 808, 820.47. Pochi (n43)67–......