R v Storey

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1978-1012 HCA A,[1978] HCA 39
Year1978
Date1978
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
61 cases
  • Rogers v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Libke v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 20 June 2007
    ...and Kitto JJ. 20 (2005) 224 CLR 300 at 316 [41]; see also Driscoll v The Queen (1977)137 CLR 517 at 524–525 per Barwick CJ; R v Storey (1978) 140 CLR 364 at 376 per Barwick CJ; Morris v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 454; M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 at 6......
  • Saraswati v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Libke v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 20 June 2007
    ...and Kitto JJ. 20 (2005) 224 CLR 300 at 316 [41]; see also Driscoll v The Queen (1977)137 CLR 517 at 524–525 per Barwick CJ; R v Storey (1978) 140 CLR 364 at 376 per Barwick CJ; Morris v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 454; M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; Festa v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR 593 at 6......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Forensic Investigations and Miscarriages of Justice. The Rhetoric Meets The Reality Part Three
    • 15 June 2010
    ...R. v. Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326, [1991] S.C.J. No. 83 ........... 32, 93, 124, 196, 214, 364 R. v. Storey (1978), 140 C.L.R. 364, [1978] HCA 39 ...................................................... 150 R. v. Sunbeam Corp. (1968), [1969] S.C.R. 221, [1968] S.C.J. No. 94 ...................
  • The legal structure of propensity evidence
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 20-2, April 2016
    • 1 April 2016
    ...vThe Queen [2012] 1 NZLR 298 [8]–[9].129. RvArp, n. 28 at [76]–[80].130. No direct authority, but see Heydon (2015: [5155]); RvStorey (1978) 140 CLR 364, 372.131. For example, Hoch (1988) 165 CLR 292; but see Jones vThe Queen [2014] NSWCCA 280 [75]; Handy, n. 1 at [134]; EAsection 43(3)(e).......
  • Fair's Fair?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-1, January 2008
    • 1 January 2008
    ...7th and8th, but not 2nd, 5th or 9th), and some less influential state courts, such as Colorado and NorthCarolina, favour discretion.14 (1978) 140 CLR 364. significance of acquittal in the earlier case is a condition for the admissibility of itsfacts in the later.The reasoning attempting to ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT