Rodney Jane Racing Pty Ltd v Monster Energy Company

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date21 June 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 923
CourtFederal Court
Date21 June 2019


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Rodney Jane Racing Pty Ltd v Monster Energy Company [2019] FCA 923


Appeal from:

Monster Energy Co v Rodney Jane Racing Pty Ltd [2018] ATMO 57



File number(s):

VID 553 of 2018



Judge(s):

O'BRYAN J



Date of judgment:

21 June 2019



Catchwords:

TRADE MARKS – registration – opposition – appeal from decision of Registrar of Trade Marks refusing registration – whether appellant had valid claim to ownership of marks at priority date – whether appellant intended to use or authorise use of marks at priority date – whether marks likely to deceive or cause confusion – appeal allowed


EVIDENCE – admissibility of documents downloaded from websites, the Wayback Machine, Facebook and Instagram and data generated by Google Analytics – whether documents constitute business records under section 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – whether Court should exercise its discretion under section 135 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) to exclude the evidence



Legislation:

Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 7(3), 8, 42(b), 58, 59, 60



Cases cited:

ACCC v Air New Zealand Limited (No 1) (2012) 207 FCR 448

ACCC v Air New Zealand Limited (No 5) (2012) 301 ALR 352

ACCC v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd (2014) 317 ALR 73

Asden Developments Pty Ltd (in liq) v Dinoris (No 2) (2015) 235 FCR 382

ASIC v Hellicar (2012) 247 CLR 345

Aston v Harlee Manufacturing Co (1960) 103 CLR 391

Australian Meat Group Pty Ltd v JBS Australia Pty Ltd (2018) 363 ALR 113

Australian Postal Corporation v Digital Post Australia Pty Ltd (2013) 308 ALR 1

Berlei Hestia Industries Ltd v Bali Co Inc (1973) 129 CLR 353

Brooks v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd[2015] NSWSC 986

CA Henschke & Co v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd (2000) 52 IPR 42

Caesarstone Ltd v Ceramiche Caesar SpA (No 2) (2018) 133 IPR 417

Campomar Sociedad, Limitada v Nike International Ltd (2000) 202 CLR 45

Charan v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 3

Chong v CC Containers Pty Ltd (2015) 49 VR 402

Coca-Cola Co v All-Fect Distributors Ltd(1999) 96 FCR 107

Colorado Group Limited v Strandbags Group Pty Limited(2007) 164 FCR 506

Crazy Ron’s Communications Pty Ltd v Mobileworld Communications Pty Ltd (2004) 209 ALR 1

de Cordova v Vick Chemical Co (1951) 68 RPC 103

Delfi Chocolate Manufacturing SA v Mars Australia Pty Ltd (2015) 115 IPR 82

Dowling v Commonwealth Bank of Australia[2008] FCA 59

Dunlop Aircraft Tyres Ltd v Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (2018) 134 IPR 220

E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd (2008) 77 IPR 69

E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd(2010) 241 CLR 144

Flexopack S.A. Plastics Industry v Flexopack Australia Pty Ltd (2016) 118 IPR 239

Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP (2010) 185 FCR 9

Gain Capital UK Ltd v Citigroup Inc (No 4) (2017) 123 IPR 234

Google Inc v ACCC (2013) 249 CLR 435

Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd(2008) 75 IPR 505

Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd(2008) 171 FCR 579

Hills Industries Ltd v Bitek Pty Ltd (2011) 214 FCR 396

Hugo Boss AG v Jackson International Trading Co Kurt D Bruhl GmbH & Co KG (1999) 47 IPR 423

JafferjeevScarlett(1937)57CLR115

Jones v Dunkel(1959) 101 CLR 298

Lodestar Anstalt v Campari America LLC (2016) 244 FCR 557

Manly Council v Byrne [2004] NSWCA 123

Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (2009) 81 IPR 354

McCormick & Co Inc v McCormick (2000) 51 IPR 102

McMahon v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd (No 4)[2012] NSWSC 216

Metro Business Centre Pty Ltd v Centrefold Entertainment Pty Ltd (2017) 127 IPR 1

Moorgate Tobacco Co Ltd v Philip Morris Ltd (No 2) (1984) 156 CLR 414

National Telecoms Group Ltd v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd (No 1)[2011] NSWSC 455

Optical88LtdvOptical88PtyLtd(No2)(2010) 275 ALR 526

Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191

Pedavoli v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (2014) 324 ALR 166

Pfizer Products Inc v Karam (2006) 219 FCR 585

Pham Global Pty Ltd v Insight Clinical Imaging Pty Ltd (2017) 251 FCR 379

Pioneer Kabushiki Kaisha v Registrar of Trade Marks (1977) 137 CLR 670

PoloTextileIndustriesPtyLtdvDomesticTextileCorporationPtyLtd(1993)42FCR227

Qantas Airways Ltd v Edwards (2016) 338 ALR 134

Re Rysta Ltd’s Application (1943) 60 RPC 87

Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Limited(1999) 93 FCR 365

Roach v Page (No 15)[2003] NSWSC 939

Roach v Page (No 27)[2003] NSWSC 1046

RPS v R(2000) 199 CLR 620

SavillePerfumeryLtdvJunePerfectLtd(1941)58RPC147

Seven Network Ltd v News Limited [2007] FCA 1062

Shape Shopfitters Pty Ltd v Shape Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 474

Shell Company of Australia Ltd v Esso Standard Oil (Aust) Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 407

Shell Company of Australia Ltd v Rohm and Haas Company (1949) 78 CLR 601

Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Optum (2018) 140 IPR 1

Southern Cross Airports v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue[2011] NSWSC 349

Southern Cross Refrigerating Co v Toowoomba Foundry Pty Ltd(1954) 91 CLR 592

Sports Warehouse Inc v Fry Consulting Pty Ltd (2010) 186 FCR 519

Stone & Wood Group Pty Ltd v Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (2018) 357 ALR 15

Telstra Corp Ltd v Phone Directories Co Pty Ltd (2014) 316 ALR 590

Telstra Corporation Limited v Phone Directories Co Australia Ltd (2015) 237 FCR 388

Tivo Inc v Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 252

Trident Seafoods Corp v Trident Foods Pty Ltd (2018) 137 IPR 65

Vendor Advocacy Australia Pty Ltd v Seitanidis (2013) 103 IPR 1

Vitali v Stachnik[2001] NSWSC 303

Vivo International Corporation Pty Ltd v Tivo Inc (2012) 294 ALR 661

Voxson Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Limited (No. 10) (2018) 134 IPR 99

Yarra Valley Dairy Pty Ltd v Lemnos Foods Pty Ltd (2010) 191 FCR 297



Date of hearing:

5, 6, 7 March 2019 and 15, 16 April 2019



Registry:

Victoria



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Intellectual Property



Sub-area:

Trade Marks



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

206



Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr E Heerey QC with Mr P Creighton-Selvay

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
12 cases
  • Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Henley Constructions Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 November 2021
    ...Corporation Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 252 at [336] and [438] per Dodds-Streeton J; Rodney Jane Racing Pty Ltd v Monster Energy Company [2019] FCA 923; 370 ALR 140 at [84(h)] per O’Bryan J. The likelihood of deception or confusion from the use of the opposed mark must arise because of the reputatio......
  • Taylor v Killer Queen, LLC (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 21 April 2023
    ...280 Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 365 Rodney Jane Racing Pty Ltd v Monster Energy Company (2019) 142 IPR 275; [2019] FCA 923 Self Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd v Allergan Australia Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 8 Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness; James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v McGuinness......
  • Monster Energy Company v Mixi Inc
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 1 October 2020
    ...338 ALR 134 Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd [1999] FCA 1020; 93 FCR 365 Rodney Jane Racing Pty Ltd v Monster Energy Company [2019] FCA 923; 370 ALR 140 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Optum Inc [2018] FCA 575; 140 IPR 1 Southern Cross Refrigerating v Toowoomba Foundry Pty Ltd [1954] HCA 8......
  • McCallum, in the Matter of Re Holdco Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 21 April 2021
    ...NSWSC 852; 277 FLR 337 Reliance Finance Corporation Pty Ltd v Heid [1982] 1 NSWLR 466 Rodney Jane Racing Pty Ltd v Monster Energy Company [2019] FCA 923; 370 ALR 140 State Government Insurance Office (Qld) v Rees (1979) 144 CLR 549 Wossidlo v Catt (1934) 52 CLR 301 Division: General Divisio......
  • Get Started for Free