Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1999-1111 FCA I,1999-0218 FCA C |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton
...the payment has failed to materialise or, if it did exist, has failed to sustain itself.’ 32 As Gummow J pointed out in Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd 54, failure of consideration for the purpose of a claim for money had and received is not confined by contractual principl......
-
Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd
...for the respondent (instructed by Clayton Utz) Business Franchise Licences (Tobacco) Act 1987 (NSW), ss 41, 45. Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Limited Contract — Money had and received — Total failure of consideration — Contract between wholesaler and retailers — Wholesale cos......
- Australian Capital Territory v Queanbeyan City Council
-
Farah ConstructIons Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd
...is not a ‘definitive legal principle according to its own terms’ 128. If it were not so, as Gummow J pointed out in Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd129: ‘[S]ubstance and dynamism may be restricted by dogma. In turn, the dogma will tend to generate new fictions in order to re......
Request a trial to view additional results