Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Neutral Citation | 1999-1111 FCA I |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
16 cases
-
Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton
...the payment has failed to materialise or, if it did exist, has failed to sustain itself.’ 32 As Gummow J pointed out in Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd 54, failure of consideration for the purpose of a claim for money had and received is not confined by contractual principl......
-
Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council
... ... JJ S263/2000 HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA Royal Botanic Gardens and ... (Australia) Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 226 at 241; Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd (2001) 185 ALR 335 ... ...
-
Farah ConstructIons Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd
...is not a ‘definitive legal principle according to its own terms’ 128. If it were not so, as Gummow J pointed out in Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd129: ‘[S]ubstance and dynamism may be restricted by dogma. In turn, the dogma will tend to generate new fictions in order to re......
- Australian Capital Territory v Queanbeyan City Council
Get Started for Free