Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2000-1102 FCA B,2001-0629 FCA L
Date2000
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Kennedy v Baker
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Transport Workers’ Union of New South Wales v Australian Industrial Relations Commission
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 6 March 2008
    ...parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 (2000) 204 CLR 82 cited Re Sterling; Ex parte Esanda Ltd (1980) 30 ALR 77 cited Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth [2000] FCA 1546 (2000) 106 FCR 554 cited SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 26 (2007) 235 ALR 609 cited The Trolly, Draymen and Car......
  • Motor Trades Association of Australia Superannuation Fund Pty Limited v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 June 2008
    ...R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Barrett (1945) 70 CLR 141 followed Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth [2000] FCA 1546, 106 FCR 554 followed Salerno v National Crime Authority (1997) 75 FCR 133 followed Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (No......
  • Kamha v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 13 September 2007
    ...Re VBJ and Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (2005) 87 ALD 747, (2005) 60 ATR 1013 referred to Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2000) 106 FCR 554 followed Seymour v Attorney-General (Cth) (1984) 4 FCR 498 cited Stack v Commissioner of Patents (1999) 161 ALR 531cited Swan Portland Cem......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Will the High Court ‘WAKIM’ Chapter II of the Constitution?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...183 (2000) 204 CLR 82, 101 [42] (with whom Hayne J agreed: 144 [172]). 184 See, eg, Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2000) 106 FCR 554, 573 [91] (Weinberg J); Electricity Supply Association of Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2001) 113 FCR 230, 257 [96] (Finn J)......
  • Judicial Review and Merits Review: Are the Boundaries Being Eroded?
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 45-4, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...maintenance of the binary divide. 202 Duncan v Hotop [2004] FCA 274, [10] (22 March 2004); Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (2000) 106 FCR 554, 575 [105]; Peek v Chief Executive Officer, Australian Government Solicitor (No 5) (2007) 96 ALD 37, [30]. 203 ActewAGL Distribution v The......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT