Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | 2000-1102 FCA B,2001-0629 FCA L |
Date | 2000 |
Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
- Kennedy v Baker
-
Transport Workers’ Union of New South Wales v Australian Industrial Relations Commission
...parte Aala [2000] HCA 57 (2000) 204 CLR 82 cited Re Sterling; Ex parte Esanda Ltd (1980) 30 ALR 77 cited Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth [2000] FCA 1546 (2000) 106 FCR 554 cited SZBYR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 26 (2007) 235 ALR 609 cited The Trolly, Draymen and Car......
-
Motor Trades Association of Australia Superannuation Fund Pty Limited v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority
...R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Barrett (1945) 70 CLR 141 followed Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth [2000] FCA 1546, 106 FCR 554 followed Salerno v National Crime Authority (1997) 75 FCR 133 followed Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (No......
-
Kamha v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority
...Re VBJ and Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (2005) 87 ALD 747, (2005) 60 ATR 1013 referred to Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2000) 106 FCR 554 followed Seymour v Attorney-General (Cth) (1984) 4 FCR 498 cited Stack v Commissioner of Patents (1999) 161 ALR 531cited Swan Portland Cem......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Will the High Court ‘WAKIM’ Chapter II of the Constitution?
...183 (2000) 204 CLR 82, 101 [42] (with whom Hayne J agreed: 144 [172]). 184 See, eg, Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (2000) 106 FCR 554, 573 [91] (Weinberg J); Electricity Supply Association of Australia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2001) 113 FCR 230, 257 [96] (Finn J)......
-
Judicial Review and Merits Review: Are the Boundaries Being Eroded?
...maintenance of the binary divide. 202 Duncan v Hotop [2004] FCA 274, [10] (22 March 2004); Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (2000) 106 FCR 554, 575 [105]; Peek v Chief Executive Officer, Australian Government Solicitor (No 5) (2007) 96 ALD 37, [30]. 203 ActewAGL Distribution v The......