U v U
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Gleeson CJ,Gaudron J,McHugh J,Gummow,Callinan JJ,Kirby J,Hayne J |
| Judgment Date | 05 September 2002 |
| Neutral Citation | 2002-0905 HCA B,[2002] HCA 36 |
| Docket Number | S256/2001 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 05 September 2002 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
173 cases
-
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v B
...Reform Act 1995 (Cth) (‘the 1995 Act’) and since has been amended. The structure of Pt VII was described in Northern Territory v GPAO51 and U v U52. 60 The father sought interim and final orders that the five children reside with him or, in the alternative, that orders be made protective of......
- Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Company Ltd
-
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wang
...(1981) 148 CLR 170 at 176-178; Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513 at 517-519. 137 Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513 at 518. 138 U v U (2002) 76 ALJR 1416 at 1431 [93]-[94]; 191 ALR 289 at (1994) 50 FCR 60 at 66-67; Re Quinn and Australian Postal Corporation (1992) 15 AAR 519 at 525-526. 1......
-
K v K
...[42]). 97 Similar observations were made by Gaudron and Kirby JJ in their (dissenting) judgments in the High Court of Australia in U v U [2002] HCA 36. In her judgment, Gaudron J expressed regret that “ stereotypical views as to the proper role of a mother are still pervasive and render the......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
What age can a child refuse to see a parent in Australia?
...child's views depending on their age, maturity, and level of understanding. This concept was established in the notable case of 'U v U' (2002) 211 CLR 238, where the High Court stated that their views should be given more weight as a child grows Each case is unique, and courts will consider......
3 books & journal articles
-
Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
...incorporating sections of the 1951 Refugees Convention — and the validity of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal); U v U (2002) 211 CLR 238 (Gummow, Callinan and Kirby JJ re: interpretation of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth); Wilson v Anderson (2002) 213 CLR 401 (Kirby J re: interpretat......
-
Freedom of Movement in an ERA of Shared Parenting: The Differences in Judicial Approaches to Relocation
...as it was prior to the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006 (Cth). 6 AMS v AIF (1999) 199 CLR 160; U v U (2002) 211 CLR 238. A succinct summary of the law was given by the Full Court of the Family Court in Bolitho v Cohen (2005) 33 Fam LR 471, 472 explaining the ef......
-
U. v. U.: the High Court on relocation.
...and their parents yet is so unpredictable and has no follow up mechanisms to assess the results and impacts of the decisions. * (2002) 191 ALR 289. (1) (2002) 191 ALR (2) U v U (Unreported, Faro y Court of Australia, O'Ryan J, 6 March 2000) 2. (3) U v U (Unreported, Full Court of the Family......