Wall v R; ex parte King Won and Wah on
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1927] HCA 4,1927-0318 HCA A |
| Date | 1927 |
| Year | 1927 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
- Capital Tv and Appliances Pty Ltd v Falconer
- Dale v Western Australia
-
Ffrost v Stevenson (1937) 58 CLR 528
...Bernasconi 59 (1915) 19 CLR 629, Porter v R; Ex parte Yee 60 (1926) 37 CLR 432 and Wall v R; Ex parte King Won and Wah On [No. 1] 61 (1927) 39 CLR 245, different consequences may be produced by referring the New Guinea Act 1920–1935 to some legislative power other than that contained in s12......
- Naav v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
...contrary proposition, viz, that s 122 provided the power. 171 Zines, above n 82, 177; cf Wall v The King; Ex parte King Won and Wah On (1927) 39 CLR 245, 261–2 (Higgins J). 172 (1999) 200 CLR 322. 173 See text accompanying below nn 203–219. 174 The exercise of the two distinct powers can be......
-
THE KIRK STRUCTURAL CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATION.
...Groves and Weeks (n 5) 11. (42) See Crawford (n 15) 113. (43) Constitution s 73. (44) Wall v The King; Ex parte King Won [No 1] (1927) 39 CLR 245, 261 (Higgins J) (45) Lindell (n 7) 397. (46) Burns (n 28) 330 [20] (Kiefel CJ, Bell and Keane JJ). See also Stellios, The Federal Judicature (n ......