Ward v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1980] HCA 11,1980-0501 HCA B
Year1980
Date1980
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 cases
  • Lipohar v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Arnold v Minister Administering the Water Management Act 2000
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 February 2010
    ...Deakin, (1965), vol 1 at 84–88. 67 18 & 19 Vict c 54. See the reasons of Stephen J in Ward v The Queen (1980) 142 CLR 308 at 315–324; [1980] HCA 11. 68 The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth, (1901) at 893. See also Lyons v Winter (1899) 25 VLR 464 at 69 (2009) 261 ALR 65......
  • Facebook Inc v Australian Information Commissioner
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 7 February 2022
    ...(No 2) (1877) 3 QBD 28 Valve Corporation v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2017] FCAFC 224 ; 258 FCR 190 Ward v The Queen [1980] HCA 11; 142 CLR 308 Pound, NR “Causation” (1957) 67 Yale Law Journal 1 Division: Registry: National Practice Area: being here the operation of ......
  • Hazlett v Presnell
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 22 October 1982
    ...is currently lessee of the island under a 15 year lease granted by the Minister of Lands (Vic) on 1 July 1971. In Ward v RUNKUNK (1980) 29 ALR 175; 142 CLR 308, this court examined the combined effect of the provision in the Separation Act of 1850 establishing as part of the boundary of the......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Restitution in Private International Law.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 1, April 2002
    • 1 April 2002
    ...161 fn 13, 162 fnn 14, 15, 17-21. (34) Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v Lee Kui Jak [1987] 1 AC 871,897; Ward v The Queen (1980) 142 CLR 308; SS Lotus (France v Turkey) 1927 PCIJ (Ser A) No 10, 23. See also Gutnick v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2001] VSC 305 (Unreported, Hedigan J,......
  • AUSTRALIAN HISTORIANS AND HISTORIOGRAPHY IN THE COURTROOM.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 No. 3, April 2020
    • 1 April 2020
    ...The Origins and Effects of State Compulsory Arbitration, 1890-1914 (Oxford University Press, 1989) 74. (87) Ward v The Queen (1980) 142 CLR 308, 335 (Stephen J), citing Geoffrey Serle, The Golden Age: A History of the Colony of Victoria, 1851-1861 (Melbourne University Press, 1963); New Sou......