Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | BROMBERG J |
| Judgment Date | 08 March 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] FCA 308 |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Date | 08 March 2019 |
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308
|
File number: |
WAD 6064 of 1998 |
|
|
|
|
Judge: |
BROMBERG J |
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment: |
8 March 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
NATIVE TITLE – application for determination of native title in relation to areas the subject of separate questions (“Trial Area”) – whether application authorised by all persons in the “native title claim group” under s 61(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (“NTA”) – whether the application was authorised by a decision-making process that complied with s 251B of the NTA – whether the Court should exercise the discretion in s 84D(4) of the NTA – whether, assuming the claim was authorised, the application should succeed – discussion of legal principles and relevant inquiries under s 223(1) of the NTA – assessment of the traditional laws and customs associated with the Trial Area and specifically the traditional laws and customs which provide for the holdings and sharing of possessory rights and interests in particular land and waters by a group or sub-set of Western Desert persons – whether pursuant to those traditional laws and customs the members of the claimant group are a single group or sub-set of Western Desert Society holding and sharing possessory rights in the Trial Area – whether, insofar as the group possessory rights and interests of the claimant group existed at sovereignty, those traditional laws and customs, and in particular the laws relating to the acquisition, transmission and exercise of rights to land and waters continue to be recognised and observed by the claimant group as a whole – whether those traditional laws and customs (insofar as they continue to be recognised and observed by the claimant group) are to be characterised as providing a connection between the clamant group and the Trial Area – held that application not authorised and not a claim made by persons who, under the traditional laws and customs, constitute a group recognised by those laws as holding group rights to the Trial Area – existence of native title as claimed not established |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13(1), 61, 61(1), 84D, 84D(4), 223, 223(1), 223(1)(a), 225, 251B, 251B(a), 251B(b), 253 |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
AD (deceased) on behalf of the Mirning People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 1000 Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Islanders of the Regional Seas Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 2) [2010] FCA 643 Alyawarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakay Native Title Claim Group v Northern Territory (2004) 207 ALR 539 Anderson v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 1423 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australian [2010] FCA 206 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 2)[2010] FCA 1472 Bidjara People v State of Queensland (No 2) [2013] FCA 1229 Bodney v Bennell (2008) 167 FCR 84 Booth on behalf of the Kungardutyi Punthamara People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 638 Brown v State of South Australia [2009] FCA 206 Burragubba on behalf of the Wangan and Jagalingou People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 373 CG v State of Western Australia (2016) 240 FCR 466 Collins on behalf of the Wongkumara People v Harris on behalf of the Palpamudramudra Yandrawandra People [2016] FCA 527 Commonwealth v Clifton [2007] FCAFC 190 Commonwealth v Yarmirr (2001) 208 CLR 1 De Rose v State of South Australia [2002] FCA 1342 De Rose v State of South Australia (2003) 133 FCR 325 De Rose v State of South Australia (No 2) (2005) 145 FCR 290 Harrington-Smith v State of Western Australia (No 9) (2007) 238 ALR 1 Hazelbane v Northern Territory of Australia [2014] FCA 886 Holborow v State of Western Australia [2002] FCA 1428 Jango v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 318 Laing v State of South Australia (No 2) [2012] FCA 980 Lawson on behalf of the ‘Pooncarie’ Barkandji (Paakantyi) People v Minister for Land and Water (NSW) [2002] FCA 1517 Narrier v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 1519 N.C. (deceased) v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 70 Pegler on behalf of the Widi People of the Nebo Estate No 1 v State of Queensland [2014] FCA 932 Reid v State of South Australia [2007] FCA 1479 Rita Augustine v State of Western Australia [2013] FCA 338 Sampi on behalf of the Bardi and Jawi People v State of Western Australia (2010) 266 ALR 537 Sampi v State of Western Australia [2005] FCA 777 Strickland v State of Western Australia [2013] FCA 677 Velickovic v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 782 Yorta Yorta v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422 Western Australia v Ward (2002) 213 CLR 1 |
|
|
|
|
Dates of hearing: |
13-22 March 2017, 29 May-1 June 2017, 19-20 September 2017 |
|
|
|
|
Registry: |
|
|
|
|
|
Division: |
|
|
|
|
|
National Practice Area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Category: |
Catchwords |
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs: |
456 |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Applicant: |
Mr I Viner AO QC with Mr P Tolcon |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the State of Western Australia: |
Mr D O’Gorman SC with Mr M Pudovskis |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the State of Western Australia: |
State Solicitor’s Office |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for Central Desert Native Title Services Ltd: |
Mr M O’Dell |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for Central Desert Native Title Services Ltd: |
Central Desert Native Title Services Limited |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
|
|
WAD 6064 of 1998 |
|
|
|
||
|
BETWEEN: |
RAYMOND WILLIAM ASHWIN & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE WUTHA PEOPLE Applicant
|
|
|
AND: |
STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS Respondents
|
|
|
BACKGROUND |
[5] |
|
Claim Area |
[5] |
|
The course of the trial |
[14] |
|
Lay witnesses and apical ancestors |
[22] |
|
Geoffrey Ashwin |
[25] |
|
Ralph Ashwin |
[30] |
|
John Ashwin |
[34] |
|
Bradley Ashwin |
[38] |
|
Calvin Ashwin |
[41] |
|
Gary Ashwin |
[44] |
|
June Ashwin |
[48] |
|
Ron Harrington-Smith |
[51] |
|
Sheldon Harrington-Smith |
[57] |
|
Joshua Harrington-Smith |
[61] |
|
Gay Harris |
[65] |
|
Lorraine Barnard |
[69] |
|
Luxie Hogarth |
[73] |
|
Geraldine Hogarth |
[77] |
|
Expert Evidence |
[80] |
|
Use of lay and expert evidence and objections to evidence |
[108] |
|
Other background matters |
[115] |
|
Western Desert |
[116] |
|
Tjukurrpa |
[120] |
|
THE PROCEDURAL HISTORY OF THE WUTHA APPLICATION |
[136] |
|
IS THE WUTHA APPLICATION AUTHORISED? |
[168] |
Has the... |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Malone v State of Queensland (The Clermont-Belyando Area Native Title Claim) (No 5)
...FCA 625 Ashby v Slipper (2014) 219 FCR 322; [2014] FCAFC 15 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308 Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Limited v Kerr [2021] NSWCA 5 Ballantyne v. Mackinnon (1896) 65 L.J.Q.B. 616 Banjima People v Western Austral......
-
Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3)
...Commissioner of Territory Revenue (NT) [2009] HCA 41; 239 CLR 27 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308; 369 ALR 1 Booth on behalf of the Kungardutyi Punthamara People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 638 Brown v State of South Australia [200......
-
Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) (No 4)
...(No 4) [2012] FCA 1268 Ah‑Chee v Stuart [2019] FCAFC 165 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17; (2012) 247 CLR 345 Badimia People v Western Australia [2016] FCAFC 67; ......
-
Blucher on behalf of the Gaangalu Nation People v State of Queensland (No 3)
...Territory of Australia (2003) 207 ALR 539; [2004] FCA 472 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) (2019) 369 ALR 1 Blackman on behalf of the Bailai, Gurang, Gooreng Gooreng, Taribelang Bunda People v State of Queensland (No 3) [2017] FCA 1637 Bodney v Bennel......