Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeBROMBERG J
Judgment Date08 March 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 308
CourtFederal Court
Date08 March 2019
Judgment Template

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308


File number:

WAD 6064 of 1998



Judge:

BROMBERG J



Date of judgment:

8 March 2019



Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE – application for determination of native title in relation to areas the subject of separate questions (“Trial Area”) – whether application authorised by all persons in the “native title claim group” under s 61(1) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (“NTA”) – whether the application was authorised by a decision-making process that complied with s 251B of the NTA – whether the Court should exercise the discretion in s 84D(4) of the NTA – whether, assuming the claim was authorised, the application should succeed – discussion of legal principles and relevant inquiries under s 223(1) of the NTA – assessment of the traditional laws and customs associated with the Trial Area and specifically the traditional laws and customs which provide for the holdings and sharing of possessory rights and interests in particular land and waters by a group or sub-set of Western Desert persons – whether pursuant to those traditional laws and customs the members of the claimant group are a single group or sub-set of Western Desert Society holding and sharing possessory rights in the Trial Area – whether, insofar as the group possessory rights and interests of the claimant group existed at sovereignty, those traditional laws and customs, and in particular the laws relating to the acquisition, transmission and exercise of rights to land and waters continue to be recognised and observed by the claimant group as a whole – whether those traditional laws and customs (insofar as they continue to be recognised and observed by the claimant group) are to be characterised as providing a connection between the clamant group and the Trial Area – held that application not authorised and not a claim made by persons who, under the traditional laws and customs, constitute a group recognised by those laws as holding group rights to the Trial Area – existence of native title as claimed not established



Legislation:

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 13(1), 61, 61(1), 84D, 84D(4), 223, 223(1), 223(1)(a), 225, 251B, 251B(a), 251B(b), 253



Cases cited:

AD (deceased) on behalf of the Mirning People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 1000

Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Islanders of the Regional Seas Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 2) [2010] FCA 643

Alyawarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakay Native Title Claim Group v Northern Territory (2004) 207 ALR 539

Anderson v State of Western Australia [2003] FCA 1423

Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australian [2010] FCA 206

Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 2)[2010] FCA 1472

Bidjara People v State of Queensland (No 2) [2013] FCA 1229

Bodney v Bennell (2008) 167 FCR 84

Booth on behalf of the Kungardutyi Punthamara People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 638

Brown v State of South Australia [2009] FCA 206

Burragubba on behalf of the Wangan and Jagalingou People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 373

CG v State of Western Australia (2016) 240 FCR 466

Collins on behalf of the Wongkumara People v Harris on behalf of the Palpamudramudra Yandrawandra People [2016] FCA 527

Commonwealth v Clifton [2007] FCAFC 190

Commonwealth v Yarmirr (2001) 208 CLR 1

De Rose v State of South Australia [2002] FCA 1342

De Rose v State of South Australia (2003) 133 FCR 325

De Rose v State of South Australia (No 2) (2005) 145 FCR 290

Harrington-Smith v State of Western Australia (No 9) (2007) 238 ALR 1

Hazelbane v Northern Territory of Australia [2014] FCA 886

Holborow v State of Western Australia [2002] FCA 1428

Jango v Northern Territory of Australia [2006] FCA 318

Laing v State of South Australia (No 2) [2012] FCA 980

Lawson on behalf of the ‘Pooncarie’ Barkandji (Paakantyi) People v Minister for Land and Water (NSW) [2002] FCA 1517

Narrier v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 1519

N.C. (deceased) v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 70

Pegler on behalf of the Widi People of the Nebo Estate No 1 v State of Queensland [2014] FCA 932

Reid v State of South Australia [2007] FCA 1479

Rita Augustine v State of Western Australia [2013] FCA 338

Sampi on behalf of the Bardi and Jawi People v State of Western Australia (2010) 266 ALR 537

Sampi v State of Western Australia [2005] FCA 777

Strickland v State of Western Australia [2013] FCA 677

Velickovic v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 782

Yorta Yorta v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422

Western Australia v Ward (2002) 213 CLR 1



Dates of hearing:

13-22 March 2017, 29 May-1 June 2017, 19-20 September 2017



Registry:

Western Australia



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Native Title



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

456



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr I Viner AO QC with Mr P Tolcon



Counsel for the State of Western Australia:

Mr D O’Gorman SC with Mr M Pudovskis



Solicitor for the State of Western Australia:

State Solicitor’s Office



Counsel for Central Desert Native Title Services Ltd:

Mr M O’Dell



Solicitor for Central Desert Native Title Services Ltd:

Central Desert Native Title Services Limited



REASONS FOR JUDGMENT


WAD 6064 of 1998

BETWEEN:

RAYMOND WILLIAM ASHWIN & ORS ON BEHALF OF THE WUTHA PEOPLE

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Respondents



TABLE OF CONTENTS

BACKGROUND

[5]

Claim Area

[5]

The course of the trial

[14]

Lay witnesses and apical ancestors

[22]

Geoffrey Ashwin

[25]

Ralph Ashwin

[30]

John Ashwin

[34]

Bradley Ashwin

[38]

Calvin Ashwin

[41]

Gary Ashwin

[44]

June Ashwin

[48]

Ron Harrington-Smith

[51]

Sheldon Harrington-Smith

[57]

Joshua Harrington-Smith

[61]

Gay Harris

[65]

Lorraine Barnard

[69]

Luxie Hogarth

[73]

Geraldine Hogarth

[77]

Expert Evidence

[80]

Use of lay and expert evidence and objections to evidence

[108]

Other background matters

[115]

Western Desert

[116]

Tjukurrpa

[120]

THE PROCEDURAL HISTORY OF THE WUTHA APPLICATION

[136]

IS THE WUTHA APPLICATION AUTHORISED?

[168]

Has the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 cases
  • Malone v State of Queensland (The Clermont-Belyando Area Native Title Claim) (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 December 2021
    ...FCA 625 Ashby v Slipper (2014) 219 FCR 322; [2014] FCAFC 15 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308 Australian Executor Trustees (SA) Limited v Kerr [2021] NSWCA 5 Ballantyne v. Mackinnon (1896) 65 L.J.Q.B. 616 Banjima People v Western Austral......
  • Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 September 2021
    ...Commissioner of Territory Revenue (NT) [2009] HCA 41; 239 CLR 27 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308; 369 ALR 1 Booth on behalf of the Kungardutyi Punthamara People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 638 Brown v State of South Australia [200......
  • Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 21 December 2021
    ...(No 4) [2012] FCA 1268 Ah‑Chee v Stuart [2019] FCAFC 165 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17; (2012) 247 CLR 345 Badimia People v Western Australia [2016] FCAFC 67; ......
  • Blucher on behalf of the Gaangalu Nation People v State of Queensland (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 15 June 2023
    ...Territory of Australia (2003) 207 ALR 539; [2004] FCA 472 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) (2019) 369 ALR 1 Blackman on behalf of the Bailai, Gurang, Gooreng Gooreng, Taribelang Bunda People v State of Queensland (No 3) [2017] FCA 1637 Bodney v Bennel......
  • Get Started for Free