Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date16 September 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 1122
CourtFederal Court
Date16 September 2021
Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 1122


Federal Court of Australia


Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2021] FCA 1122

File numbers:



WAD 490 of 2016WAD 537 of 2018WAD 538 of 2018



Judgment of:

MORTIMER J



Date of judgment:

16 September 2021



Catchwords:

NATIVE TITLE – whether the Court has jurisdiction to make determination that native title exists and is held by a group that includes persons who did not authorise an application for the determination in question – whether the Court should exercise the discretion in s 84D(4) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether the Court is bound to follow Commonwealth of Australia v Clifton [2007] FCAFC 190; 164 FCR 355 – where the Court has previously determined that the native title in question exists and is held by the group in question



Legislation:

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 23, 37M, 37N

Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1A)(c)

Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 10, 13, 61(1), 81, 84D(4), 87, 87A, 213, 223, 225, 251B



Cases cited:

Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Islanders of the Regional Seas Claim Group v State of Queensland (No 2) [2010] FCA 643; 204 FCR 1

Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (NT) [2009] HCA 41; 239 CLR 27

Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308; 369 ALR 1

Booth on behalf of the Kungardutyi Punthamara People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 638

Brown v State of South Australia [2009] FCA 206

Cheinmora v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2013] FCA 768

Commonwealth v Clifton [2007] FCAFC 190; 164 FCR 355

Far West Coast Native Title Claim v South Australia (No 2) [2012] FCA 733; 204 FCR 542

Giggles on behalf of the Gobawarrah Minduarra Yinhawangka People v State of Western Australia [2016] FCA 792

Gordon on behalf of the Malarngowem Native Title Claim Group Part B v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 1149

Harrington-Smith on behalf of the Wongatha People v Western Australia (No 9) [2007] FCA 31; 238 ALR 1

Hayes v Northern Territory of Australia [1999] FCA 1248; 97 FCR 32

Hazelbane v Northern Territory of Australia [2014] FCA 886

Jackson v Sterling Industries Ltd [1987] HCA 23; 162 CLR 612

Jango v Northern Territory [2007] FCAFC 101; 159 FCR 531

Jones on behalf of the Yinhawangka People v State of Western Australia [2017] FCA 801

Kokatha Native Title Claim v South Australia [2005] FCA 836; 143 FCR 544

Kokatha People v State of South Australia [2007] FCA 1057

Lawson on behalf of the ‘Pooncarie’ Barkandji (Paakantyi) People v Minister for Land and Water Conservation for the State of New South Wales [2002] FCA 1517

Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1

McKenzie v South Australia [2005] FCA 22; 214 ALR 214

Miller v State of South Australia (Far West Coast Sea Claim) (No 2) [2018] FCA 599

Moses v Western Australia [2007] FCAFC 78; 160 FCR 148

Murray on behalf of the Yilka Native Title Claimants v State of Western Australia (No 5) [2016] FCA 752

Northern Territory of Australia v Alywarr, Kaytetye, Warumungu, Wakaya Native Title Claim Group [2005] FCAFC 135; 145 FCR 442

Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28l 194 CLR 355

Risk v National Native Title Tribunal [2000] FCA 1589

Sandy on behalf of the Yugara/Yugarapul People v Queensland [2012] FCA 978

Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2015] FCA 939

Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2020] FCA 1728

Starkey on behalf of the Kokatha People v State of South Australia [2018] FCAFC 36; 261 FCR 183

Strickland v Western Australia [2013] FCA 677

Taylor on behalf of the Yamatji Nation Claim v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 42

TJ v Western Australia [2015] FCA 818; 242 FCR 283

Tommy on behalf of the Yinhawangka Gobawarrah v State of Western Australia [2017] FCA 1568

Velickovic v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 782

Ward v Western Australia [1998] FCA 1478; 159 ALR 483

Western Australia v Ward [2000] FCA 191; 99 FCR 316

Yarmirr v Northern Territory of Australia [1997] FCA 274; 74 FCR 99



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Western Australia



National Practice Area:

Native Title



Number of paragraphs:

187



Date of hearing:

6 August 2021



Counsel for the applicant in WAD537/2018 and WAD538/2018:

Stephen Wright SC



Solicitor for the applicant in WAD537/2018 and WAD538/2018:

Yamatji Marlpa Aboriginal Corporation



Counsel for the applicant in WAD490/2016:

Tina Jowett



Solicitor for the applicant in WAD490/2016:

Cross Country Native Title Services



Counsel for the State of Western Australia:

Griff Ranson


Table of Corrections




8 November 2021

In the third sentence of paragraph 34, “their” has been replaced with “its”.



8 November 2021

In the third sentence of paragraph 53, “the Jurruru applicants submit” has been replaced with “the Jurruru applicant submits”.



8 November 2021

In the fourth sentence of paragraph 76, the second occurrence of “that” has been deleted.



8 November 2021

In the second sentence of paragraph 103, “-[1309]” has been inserted after “[1308]”.



8 November 2021

In the heading above paragraph 135, “the separate power in s 87(1A)” has been replaced with “the separate powers in s 87 and s 87A”.



8 November 2021

In the first sentence of paragraph 147, “finding” has been replaced with “funding”.



8 November 2021

In the fourth sentence of paragraph 151, the first occurrence of “has” has been deleted.



8 November 2021

In the second sentence of paragraph 160, “the” has been deleted.



8 November 2021

In the second sentence of paragraph 167, “interest” has been replaced with “interests”.



8 November 2021

In the eighth sentence of paragraph 169, “all” has been deleted.

ORDERS


WAD 537 of 2018

BETWEEN:

IVAN SMIRKE, ALEC ALEXANDER AND KELLMAN LIMERICK

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Respondent



WAD 538 of 2018

BETWEEN:

IVAN SMIRKE, ALEX ALEXANDER AND KELLMAN LIMERICK

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Respondent



WAD 490 of 2016

BETWEEN:

ROY TOMMY, NANCY TOMMY, MARY MILLS & ORS

Applicant


AND:

STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS

Respondent




order made by:

MORTIMER J

DATE OF ORDER:

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 cases