Clark v Ryan

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1960-0705 HCA A,[1960] HCA 42
Year1960
Date1960
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
68 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...with another expert who would not have seen the premises at the crucial time.” Phillips LJ made similar comments. 497 Clark v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486 at 491, per Dixon CJ; James Longley & Co Ltd v South West Regional Health Authority (1983) 25 BLR 56 at 62–63, per Lloyd J; R v Bonython (198......
  • The Definition and Discovery of Facts in Native Title: The Historian's Contribution
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 36-3, September 2008
    • 1 September 2008
    ...88 Nicholson, above n 24, 322. 89 See, eg, Clark v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486, 491 (Dixon CJ); Weal v Bottom (1966) 40 ALJR 436, 438–9 (Barwick CJ), 442 (Taylor J); Murphy v R (1989) 167 CLR 94, 111 (Mason CJ and Toohey J), 130–1 (Dawson J); R v Bonython (1984) 38 SASR 45, 46–7 (King CJ); Osla......
  • The Basis of the ‘Basis Rule’: The Role of the Basis Rule in the Admissibility of Expert Opinion
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 43-2, June 2015
    • 1 June 2015
    ...of the opinion evidence.'14 What is less settled is the existence of a basis rule of admissibility. Many a uthorities 10 Clark v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486, 491. 11 See generally Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Ban k Ltd [1999] NSWSC 828 (19 August 1999) [239]; Heydon, Cross on Evidence, ......
  • FACIAL RECOGNITION AND IMAGE COMPARISON EVIDENCE: IDENTIFICATION BY INVESTIGATORS, FAMILIARS, EXPERTS, SUPER-RECOGNISERS AND ALGORITHMS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 1, August 2021
    • 1 August 2021
    ...(Angel ACJ, Riley J and Olsson AJ); Dastagir (n 43) 94 [57] (Kourakis CJ, Vanstone and Stanley JJ). (87) See, eg, Clark v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486, 491-2 (Dixon CJ); R v Bonython (1984) 38 SASR 45, 46-7 (King CJ) ('Bonython'). The formulation in Bonython (n 87) that refers to 'reliability' h......