Stubley v Western Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGummow,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ.,Heydon J.,MM
Judgment Date30 March 2011
Neutral Citation2011-0330 HCA A,[2011] HCA 7
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberP29/2010
Date30 March 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Robert Lindsay Hughes(Appellant) v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 June 2017
    ...A Crim R 451 at 485 [125]. 92 (2014) 87 NSWLR 481 at 491 [44]. 93 (2015) 88 NSWLR 93 at 113 [72]. 94 See Stubley v Western Australia (2011) 242 CLR 374 at 416–417 [143]; [2011] HCA 95 (2014) 239 A Crim R 528 . 96 (2014) 239 A Crim R 528 at 537–538 [40]–[44]. 97 (2014) 45 VR 103 . 98 (2010) ......
  • Aytugrul v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 18 April 2012
    ...Code 1899 (Q), s 644; Evidence Act 1906 (WA), s 32; Criminal Code (NT), s 379. 64 See the cases set out in Stubley v Western Australia (2011) 242 CLR 374 at 402 [94], n 75; [2011] HCA 65 Old Chief v United States 519 US 172 at 200 (1997) per O'Connor J, with whom Rehnquist CJ, Scalia and Th......
  • The Queen(Plaintiff) v Grant, Donald
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 31 October 2016
    ...[2011] HCA 12, Semaan v The Queen (2013) 230 A Crim R 568, Sokolowskyj v The Queen (2014) 239 A Crim R 528, Stubley v Western Australia [2011] HCA 7, referred to Criminal Code (NT) ss 1, 181, 186 Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT) ss 97, 101, 135, 137 S Odgers, Uniform Ev......
  • The Queen v Hoffmann
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 March 2021
    ...Queen [2012] VSCA 55 at [14]. 10 Hughes v The Queen (2017) 92 ALJR 52 at [57]–[58]. 11 Relying on Stubley v State of Western Australia (2011) 242 CLR 374 at 12 See, for example, R v Joiner (2002) 133 A Crim R 90. 13 HML v The Queen (2008) 235 CLR 334 at [12] per Gleeson CJ. 14 R v Lisoff [1......
3 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 15-4, October 2011
    • 1 October 2011
    ...258–259State vRaines 857 A2d19 (Md 2004) . . . . . . . . 301State (Healy)v Donoghue [1976]IR 325. . . . . . 186Stubley vWestern Australia [2011]HCA 7 . . . 264Subramanian v Public Prosecutor [1956] 1 WLR965. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Tafisisi v A......
  • Restitution
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...v Inland Revenue Commissioners[2012] 2 WLR 1149 at [81], per Lord Walker. Even in Australia, the recent case of Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton[2011] HCA 7 signals that the Australian High Court is relenting in its previously held attitude that unjust enrichment principles are incapable of being......
  • Case Commentaries
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 15-3, July 2011
    • 1 July 2011
    ...did. Propensity evidence—Australia The relevance of evidence is a question about which judges may disagree. In Stubley v Western Australia [2011] HCA 7 the bench were divided about the relevance propensity evidence in the Court of Appeal (WA) and subsequently in the High Court and those app......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT