AB (Deceased) (on behalf of the Ngarla People) v State of Western Australia (No 4)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date2012
Neutral Citation2012-1121 FCA C
Date2012
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie on behalf of the Yindjibarndi People
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 18 Octubre 2019
    ...Land Rights Act 1983 (NSW) s 36 Iron Ore (Mount Goldsworthy) Agreement Act 1964 (WA) s 4 Cases cited: AB v Western Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1268; 300 ALR 193 AEK15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 131; 244 FCR 328 Arnold v National Westminster Bank PLC [1991]......
  • Stuart v State of South Australia (Oodnadatta Common Overlap Proceeding) (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 21 Diciembre 2021
    ...Associations Incorporation Act 1985 (SA) Cases cited: AB (decased) (on behalf of the Ngarla People) v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1268 Ah‑Chee v Stuart [2019] FCAFC 165 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308 Australian Securi......
  • Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 2 Diciembre 2020
    ...title areas Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) Cases cited: AB on behalf of the Ngarla People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1268; 300 ALR 193 Adnyamathanha No 1 Native Title Claim Group v South Australia (No 2) [2009] FCA 359 Banjima People v State of Western Australi......
  • Strickland on behalf of the Maduwongga Claim Group v State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 27 Marzo 2023
    ...in which the parties ultimately put their cases: see AB (deceased) (on behalf of the Ngarla People) v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2012] FCA 1268 at [39] (Bennett J) and the authorities cited there. In any event, no party contended that there was any significant difference between tho......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT